08.22.09

Obama: A Healthcare Stooge

Posted in Politics, Vote Out The Bums at 6:09 pm by Administrator

B.H Obama could be a national hero if he would do four things to healthcare in the United States. One: Put all the uninsured on Medicaid. Two: Allow health insurance companies to compete nationally. Three: Cap malpractice lawsuits. Four: Mandate every member of congress show a “Basic Standard of Decency”.

The first three things have been explored in depth by the media’s talking heads. The forth is a ‘back at you’ BH.

B.H. Obama’s, “Basic Standard of Decency Allows Illegals to Be Treated”, was a media headline from this past week. Basically, BH wants part of every U.S. citizen’s taxes to pay for illegals’ healthcare. Why not pay Canada’s, Mexico’s, Russia’s and South America’s healthcare costs while you’re trying to play the ‘shame on you’ card, B.H.?

Instead, B.H. could have mandated that 25% of every congressperson’s salary (and why not his and Oprah Winfrey’s, too) contribute to fund healthcare for illegals. After all, corrupt politicians are the reason illegal immigration is out-of-control. Obviously, that would not be enough money to go around, so the death panels and rationing of high risk, experimental treatments would be mandatory. Sorry illegals, some of you may have to die to serve the ‘State of Obama’.

B.H. is becoming the ‘healthcare stooge’. Jimmy Carter and Hilary are laughing on the sidelines. Soon, Jimmy wouldn’t be labeled the worst president in recent history. And Hilarycare will be forgotten.

Take your mind off the irrational and get fictionalized with the 1 Law 4 All series. Politicians’ secret lives exposed as you can only imagine.
Ad4Blog2x

BH. could have gone down as a national healthcare hero if he would have instituted the four things mentioned above. Instead, he is having a pissing contest with the American public, the conservatives and even members of his Democrat party. Someone should tell him that pissing contests are held in middle school, not in a global media arena.

B.H.’s latest mistake was attacking people saying he’s in political trouble. So as if to say, I can out piss you, he “launched a mocking counter-attack Thursday at pundits who believe the euphoric early promise of his presidency is evaporating amid bitter political warfare.” He proudly claimed, “We have been through this before, in Iowa,” Obama said, referring to the first state to hold a 2008 Democratic nominating contest, which saw him capture a come-from-behind win.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.233373d23429b898bbcc4a0e13f0af00.c41&show_article=1

B.H. should have never mentioned Iowa. Those following the primaries know his reasoning is delusional. In Iowa, as is many other caucus states, he cheated. He cheated by having busloads of brainwashed supporters infiltrate caucus sites. They in turn bullied enough people so that B.H. could walk away with an early victory. His handler’s plan worked in Iowa and many other caucus states.

From the day the Obama Illinois buses rolled into Iowa to VOTE in the Iowa caucus the Obama campaign has been a path of vote fraud. Some of us can testify to what we saw at the DNC “rules” meeting on May 31, 2008. Texas vote fraud was also huge. At the caucuses someone would take home the signed sheets to type them, and they would be returned with far more names of people never there.”
http://helpmejoseph.typepad.com/charlotte_front_and_cente/2008/10/acorncheating-l.html

ACORN !!!!!!!!

Obama’s campaign offered people things like I-pods and free stuff (t-shirts, clothes, shoes, and free meals) – to win caucuses. Then he claims victory after buying these ‘chumps for change’. He goes to the White House and lives the high life. His bused-in chumps go back to their neighborhoods. That’s the Chicago way – chumps!

B.H. Obama is a healthcare stooge when he could have been a national hero. As with all corrupt politicians, he made the political choice – not the right choice – for American citizens. That’s just another reason to Vote Out The (cheating) Bums.

VOTB: every incumbent, every election.

Enter the VOTB store and spread the idea.

08.17.09

Packing for a Long Trip

Posted in If I were President...., Politics, Vote Out The Bums at 4:26 am by Administrator

For many decades, corrupt politicians have been running government like they are packing for a long trip. Most citizens with travel experience know to pack light for long trips. We’ve all made the mistake of ‘over-packing’. Once on the trip we discover we don’t need everything we’ve packed. But we still have to lug the over-packed, heavy suitcase around. This suitcase seems to get heavier as the trip continues.

The U.S. is on a historical trip. It’s the greatest nation in the history of civilizations. But like many great nations before, government (through corrupt politicians) keeps putting stuff in the suitcase for this historical trip. The nation doesn’t need all this stuff because it will eventually weight down its carriers – the citizens.

Government, through power hungry, corrupt politicians, has made a major mistake. They have taken national concerns and have made them government responsibilities. Most of these responsibilities are not constitutional. The non-constitutional responsibilities are making government’s suitcase heavier than it should be. We don’t have the resources (tax-paying, citizen power) to carry it much longer.

The U.S. government suitcase has an entitlement sticker on it. It’s packed with welfare, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, the post office, government contracts, etc. The U.S. trip has lasted over two centuries. But there are signs the trip is ending because of the suitcase’s weight.

As the suitcase gets heavier, there are signs that tax paying U.S. citizens won’t be able to or simply won’t carry it much longer. Corrupt politicians have made concerns about people’s individual financial status government’s responsibility even though it’s unconstitutional. They are expanding an unconstitutional responsibility of healthcare (Medicare/Medicaid) to unidentifiable limits. They are also trying to play god by controlling the world’s climate.

Between 1933 and 1935 government really began stuffing things into the suitcase. FDR’s New Deal put 14 government programs in. Many of these programs were said to be for short ‘trips’. Guess what: The corrupt politicians lied!

Government’s unconstitutional responsibility called welfare still exists today. It has had only one major reform. In 1996 Bill Clinton placed lifetime limits on those receiving Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) payments. Welfare has made the suitcase heavier for all over the years.

The Social Security Act of 1935 created the single largest item in government’s suitcase. It consumes over 22% of total government expenditures. The Social Security Trustees’ Report stated that the Social Security Retirement System’s unfunded liability increased by $752 billion since the 1998 Trustee Report was published. This brings the total long-term unfunded liability to more than $19 trillion. The suitcase is getting very heavy.
http://www.socialsecurityreform.org/history/index.cfm

Placing Medicare/Medicaid into government’s suitcase took two (2) decades. Harry Truman asked Congress in 1945 to establish a national health insurance plan. Not until 20 years later in 1965, after much debate (Regan’s famous speech) with warnings about ‘socialized medicine’ did President Johnson sign into law Medicare and Medicaid. Prescription benefits were also added too the suitcase’s weight in the 2000s. Ironically, Obama is trying to add extra healthcare weight in months with little citizen debate.

The U.S. Postal service began over two centuries ago. It’s going bust and is the future of the stuff in the suitcase. Note the 8.3.09 headline. It says it all. ‘WASHINGTON – Facing staggering financial losses, the Postal Service is looking at closing nearly 1,000 offices across the country.’
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iT0TjUXd3MeCGbjIpFWYmT33BllAD99RLL5G1

Cap and trade legislation could break the suitcase handle clean off. “Under the cap-and-trade system, the federal government would limit the total volume of CO2 that U.S. companies can emit each year and would issue permits that companies would be required to have for each ton of CO2 emitted.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/31/AR2009053102077.html

“Politicians love cap and trade because they can claim to be taxing “polluters,” not workers. Hardly (corrupt politicians lying again) Once the government creates a scarce new commodity — in this case the right to emit carbon — and then mandates that businesses buy it, the costs would inevitably be passed on to all consumers in the form of higher prices.”
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123655590609066021.html

All you acorners listen up! Your man, B.H. Obama is aiming to tax you with higher consumer goods prices!!! That’s your thanks for helping him win the white house.

The current administration is being ordered to pack even more stuff into its suitcase. Cap and trade and healthcare are two items that will rival the heaviness of Social Security. These ideas may be concerns but they are not constitutional responsibilities.

If I were president…..

I would first unpack the government suitcase and examine what’s in there. The most obvious item of note would be fraud. Deceptively spread throughout the suitcase, fraud is like the odor of dirty underwear. It permeates every other item in the suitcase. I would exam very program for fraud. And then I would eliminate fraud and its future.

I see fraud as a step-sister to justice. Fraud is blind. It has no ethnicity, color or sexual orientation. But fraud is contagious. Fraudulent schemes to swindle tax dollars are limitless.

Like any most diseases, fraud has a cure. The cure requires surgery. Naturally, the opposition to surgically eliminating fraud would surface immediately.

The opposition would be the pro-fraud crowd backed by the ACLU. They would call me a racist, Nazi, un-American, homophobe, radical extremists, right wing nut whatever ….. Ultimately, the pro-fraud crowd will claim that “attacking fraud is an abuse of democracy” even though they don’t believe in democracy.

To this pro-fraud crowd, I say get real. You are being manipulated by other peoples’ ideas/causes. You’re a joke waiting for a punch line.

The ideas/cause don’t have any long-term benefits for you or your families. The ideas/cause is your handler’s wet dream of global domination. These handlers rule you. Whoever is giving you marching orders from is playing you for a sucker. Acorn, media and union people and all those bloogers are on the priority sucker-list.

You suckers get to call people with different ideas – names. You get to stir the hate pot inside your being. You can feel like winners because your brand of ideas is dictating how citizens have to live their lives.

Your ultimate victory slogan is ‘misery loves company’. At the core of your being, you are miserable and need fantasies of feeling morally superior. The joke’s punch line is – you are carrying the same suitcase as the people you are calling names!

What are the acorns, media and union people, bloggers getting for supporting government induced socialism, fascism and communism? If you are one of these ask yourself a few basic questions. How is the ideas/cause you’re supporting:
• putting food on your table?
• ensuring freedom for your kids and grand kids?
• giving you the quality of life that your politicians enjoy?
• improving your opportunities to earn more money?
• translating to a more secure lifestyle – today in your lifetime?

Whether you realize it or not, you workers are united behind carrying an extremely heavy suitcase. The stuff inside the suitcase will boil you to death like the frog in the gradually warming pot. Before you know it you and the people you’re calling names will be serfs working for the politician lords and corporate kings. Congratulations, you are helping to usher in Feudalism!

Corrupt politicians have and are continuing to over-pack the government’s suitcase. Citizens need politicians that will lighten the suitcase not make it heavier! After all, we all are hoping to extend the U.S.’s historical trip, aren’t we?

An election revolt will send corrupt politicians the ‘lighter suitcase’ message. Every incumbent politician needs to be voted out of office. The longer they stay in office, the more corrupt they become.

Every citizen will benefit from a lighter suitcase, even the acorn people.

VOTB: Vote Out The (suitcase over-stuffing) Bums – every incumbent, every election.

In the 2010 elections, we all can start unpacking the government’s suitcase.

Go to the VOTB store and spread the unpacking idea around!

08.11.09

Global Redistribution

Posted in Politics, Vote Out The Bums at 5:34 am by Administrator

Redistribution politics stirs among corrupt politicians like the plague. As with the victims of a plague, corrupt politicians don’t know where redistribution politics came from or the final outcome. Redistribution politics simple moves money from those who have more to those who have less. The questions are where is this money going and who is it affecting?

Today’s government brand of redistribution politics reinforces parts of communism, progressivism, egalitarianism, socialism, and Marxism. They all produce the ‘robin hood effect’, corrupt politicians crave. These politicians are ‘blindly’ embraced by the poor and the rich. But the middle class is screaming bloody murder because they see future opportunities to freely grow economically coming to an end.

The apparent answer to ‘where’ the money is being redistributed and ‘who’ redistribution politics affects are the citizens of the U.S. That’s not entirely correct in the bigger picture!! This is only the tip of the iceberg.

Redistribution politics is a global idea. Corrupt politicians have swallowed it to serve their own lust for power. The current president, B.H. Obama, has made numerous speeches (Berlin 4.17.09 and 7.25.09, France 4.6.09, Egypt 6.3.09) proclaiming global citizenship “binds us together”. There lies the bigger picture.

The poor in the U.S. think by backing B.H. Obama and his style of redistribution politics that money is going to flow their way. That’s why they love B.H. Unfortunately, they are delusional. By the world’s standards, the poor in the U.S. are part of the global rich. B.H. knows that and is committed to sending U.S. tax dollars out of the country as fast as possible. After all, the U.S. poor aren’t really poor they are RICH by global citizen’s standards.

Poverty is defined in the U.S. to those making/receiving about $10,000 a year. By global standards, a person making $10,000 a year is in the top 13% of the richest people in the world. And when you earn $20,000 a year you’re in the top 11% of the richest people in the world. How rich are you by global standards? The information on the site below is B.H.’s perspective!
http://www.globalrichlist.com/index.php

Close to 90% of the world’s population is poorer than anyone in the U.S. Redistribution politics is about directing money to the world’s poor.

One means of redistributing wealth is by outsourcing U.S. jobs. Outsourcing U.S. jobs began decades ago. Several outrageous examples include: Kissinger’s betrayal of U.S. citizens back in the 70’s with his Saudi oil deals; and Clinton making China an industrial power by allowing U.S. business interests access to the country’s market and labor force. Currently ‘cap and trade’ and global warming will accelerate outsourcing.

The final result for the U.S. poor of outsourcing jobs is that 99% of them are never going to have the opportunity to get out of poverty. The corrupt politicians will promise change, the ignorant poor will vote for them based on hope. In reality, any money the poor might have earned is already being shared globally. Example: $60 billion dollars is earned by illegal aliens in the U.S. each year. http://www.cairco.org/econ/econ.html

The U.S. poor are going to stay poor. They are ‘suckers’ voting to the keep redistribution politics in government. For redistribution politics to gain additional traction in the U.S., the middle and upper classes need to contribute and soon.

Union members are part of the middle class affected by redistribution politics. Union members settle for less than they are worth. They are the muscle of the American labor and politics. They are giving up individuality for group collectiveness (Sounds like communism doesn’t it?).

How many rich union members do you know? By the world’s standards, every union member making $50,000 or more is in the top 1% of the worlds rich. B.H. knows this union money needs global redistribution. Union members are mindlessly allowing it.

Unionism is a brilliant idea to keep citizens pacified. Union members can’t accumulate excessive wealth because their contracts limit how much they earn. Also, they have to pay taxes and union dues on their limited earnings. Any invested savings union members may have accumulated individually are also subjected to more taxation. The taxes corrupt politicians collect from union members and the middle class in general, allows redistribution politics to be spread globally. Union members are being played for saps. Current example is TARP money.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D.-Ohio) said on the House floor that TARP bailout funds loaned to banks are ending up overseas. Citigroup has sent $8 billion to Dubai, Bank of America has sent $7 billion to China and JPMorgan Chase has sent $1 billion to India. “Banks are taking our tax dollars and they’re shipping them abroad.”

The upper-middle class that corrupt politicians label as rich are the prime target for redistribution politics. Let’s use lawyers as an example. Lawyers, as a group, support B.H. Obama and redistribution politics. (note: Tort reform is nowhere to be found in Obamacare.) In reality, they have redistribution targets painted on their wallets.

Lawyers in U.S have an average annual salaries from $150k-$350k. $150,000 puts a lawyer in the .33% of the richest people in the world. Why would some of the richest people in the world want to support redistribution politics? Delusions of grandeur!!

Lawyers cater to people with money. When these lawyers encourage redistribution politics by supporting B.H. Obama, they will be limiting future client pool. Future clients in a socialistic society will have less money for legal matters. Look at lawyers’ earnings in a neighboring socialistic country.

In Canada, 2002, the starting salary for a person with a law degree was around C$74,300 ($68,711 US). The average salary for all lawyers was around C$99,200 ($91,738 US). In general, lawyers are among the highest paid workers in Canada. U.S. lawyers are looking at severe pay cuts in a socialistic America made in the image of redistribution politics.

Lawyers in socialist countries work in law centers and are on salary. They are legal aid lawyers. After all, in a socialized political system that supports redistribution of wealth who can they sue? (Think Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, China, etc.) Where are the rainmakers when most of industry is nationalized? The after-effects of redistribution politics leaves the nation’s citizens poorer and less able to afford lawyers.

Redistribution politics doesn’t stop with money. It can include the transfer of property from some individuals to others.

Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229 (1984), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a state could use the eminent domain process to take land overwhelmingly concentrated in the hands of private landowners, and redistribute it to the wider population of residents.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii_Housing_Authority_v._Midkiff

How far will redistribution politics go? Industry – GM. Healthcare – soon to be socialized. The once proud medical profession is being relegated to hourly, HMO worker status. In reality, the groups of people supporting redistribution politics can be identified with the term ‘serfs’ – as in feudalism. They mindlessly think government is their keeper.

The link between income inequality and governmental redistribution is subject to intense research and debate. Experimenting with the most successful capitalistic system in the history of mankind is just plain stupid. In the future, nobody will call politicians of today smart or intelligent. They will just call them corrupt!

Redistribution politics is only a mirage for the delusional. Since even the lowest occupants’ income in the U.S. isn’t poor by global standards, where is the redistributed wealth going? Simply put, redistributed wealth is going around the world.

As B.H.’s global citizens, redistribution politics is a utopian scheme played on the world stage. Bottom line: B.H. Obama’s grass roots supporters (Acorn among with others) are acting as pawns for feudalism. Acorn puppets deserve serfdom and feudalism.

Samuel Adams stated: “The utopian schemes of leveling [redistribution of wealth], and a community of goods, are as visionary and impracticable as those which vest all property in the Crown. [These ideas] are arbitrary, despotic, and, in our government, unconstitutional.”

The perception that redistribution of wealth will happen within the boundaries of the U.S. will be a letdown for many of B.H.’s supporters. When they realize that their redistribution leader is funneling (their) money to the global poor, resentment will set in. When they realize they have been had and are being used as (borrowing a line from the movie ‘Blazing Saddles’) “pawns in the game of life”, what will they do? Will Acorn, anti-war, gays and other minority groups turn their mob demonstrations on their own elected officials? Or will they be bought off with a sack lunch and more promises – again?

Common sense citizens can take matters into their own hands. VOTB. Vote while you still can win. When government gets 51% of the ‘serfs’ on their payroll, voting may become ‘Iran-like’.

For now VOTB: Vote Out The Bums – every incumbent, every election. Keep the topic of redistribution politics where it belongs, in the history books.

Go to the VOTB store and pass on the idea!

Epilogue: Corrupt politicians haven’t realized that “you can only eat the rich once”!

08.02.09

The Citizen Impact Statement

Posted in If I were President...., Politics, Vote Out The Bums at 6:12 pm by Administrator

If I were president…..

I would institute the Citizen’s Impact Statement (CIS) process. Similar to the Environmental Impact Statement process, the CIS would need to be issued before congress or the president could pass or sign any legislation into law.

If the environment is so important, how much more important are human beings? Even in a feudalistic society, humans are necessary for paying taxes and producing food/goods for the elites’ consumption.

Under U.S. Environmental Law a document is required by the National Environmental Policy Act for federal government agency actions that ‘significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.’ Using a Reagan-like public appeal, I would get congress to pass a ‘National Citizens Policy Act’. This Act would require a similar statement for all actions that ‘significantly affect the quality of human life.’

Ironically, a bill stalled in congress had a similar ring to it. H.R. 3396: Citizens Protection Act of 1998 is still buried. This bill doesn’t call for any impact statement, but it could be the beginning of a general ‘National Citizens Policy Act’. It calls for ‘ethical standards for attorneys in government.’ Now you understand why it’s stalled in committee. One could stretch those ‘ethical standards’ to include all attorneys in government – most politicians, too!

The goal of the ‘National Citizens Policy Act’ would be governmental restraint. Here’s why citizens need protection from corrupt politicians controlling today’s government.

The slightest changes in government policy can have far reaching effects on citizens. Politicians, blinded by ego and pride in their short-sided thinking, are making significant policy changes today. They actually believe they can fix anything – economy, healthcare, housing, employment, imports/exports, foreign relations, even other countries, etc. They treat everything as a stand-alone problem. They need a course in endocrinology to understand the term inter-related!

If I were President I would direct congress to place minimum academic requirements for elected politicians. (That’s another blog topic.) In the future, one of the courses all politicians would need to take is an endocrinology class for beginners. Only then will they begin to understand the inter-related ‘cause and effect’ process.

Endocrinology is the study of hormones. Hormones are produced by a variety of glands in the body. Endocrinology encompasses the inter-relationship among all these glands.

Hormones are multifunctional biochemicals that control and regulate body functions. In short, hormones affect a person’s overall health. Many disorders can result from hormone imbalance. Some of these conditions include weakening of the immune system, violent mode swings, obesity, aging, sexual dysfunctions, cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, senility, Alzheiemer’s disease, premature death, etc.

Hormone imbalances can be caused by a number of self-imposed things. Through ignorance these things can be taken into the body initiating hormone imbalances. Several common things include birth control pills, chemicals from processed food or their containers or the environment, steroid use, legal or illegal drug use, etc. These things affect one body hormone causing the desired affect. But when one hormone level is changed so are other hormone levels because they are all inter-related.

Even small quantities of these things can cause hormone imbalances. Get the point?

Politicians pass a bill to save big corporations, but they don’t anticipate the unemployment they have caused. They allow social programs’ fraud and keep on spending citizens into future debt. They pass a bill to make housing affordable to illegals and they affect every law abiding citizen’s ability to own a home in the future. Politicians authorize printing billions of dollars and then funnel it to foreigners. These same politicians don’t anticipate (or care) how that adversely affects a citizen’s purchasing power. They do a ‘cash for clunkers’ program and don’t understand how that affects affordable transportation for the less financially able.

A politician’s ignorance of this cause and effect inter-relationship is adversely affecting every U.S. citizen. The cause and effect of their actions today will make future generations very angry. Why, because ignorant politicians don’t play-out the inter-relationships of their actions.

As president I would pass a ‘National Citizens Policy Act’ that requires a Citizens Impact Statement for all congressional and presidential actions ‘significantly affecting the quality of human life.’

Citizens of the U.S. call for a ‘National Citizens Policy Act’ and a Citizens’ Impact Statement before any future federal or state laws/regulations are passed. Should elected politicians refuse to comply, vote them out – VOTB

VOTB – Vote Out The Bums: every incumbent, every election. Corrupt politicians are causing many problems for U.S. citizens. The affect should be their political unemployment!

Pass on the idea. Visit the VOTB store.