07.31.11
Posted in If I were President...., Politics at 7:00 pm by Administrator
If I am elected President of the United States, I will be the most compromising president in history. Compromising is an art complete with grace, wisdom and discernment.
A Starting Position
Each side of the potential compromise must have a starting position. This is a position based on an ideology or philosophy. The boundaries of this position are based on a moral code of ethics. The position ideology and moral code must be made obvious by the bill’s presenters. The need for any bill must consider all citizens, not only special interest groups.
Today’s political parties call for compromise without even proposing a plan. This silly tactic plays to the ignorant electorate but not to me. I would demand a plan. I would compare it with my plan. The opposition’s rational must be honest and truthful before even considering a compromising position.
The Process
With respect to all concerned, ideas are emotionally void entities. The process should be approached logically and unemotionally. Hysterical, doomsday chatter is unacceptable.
While discussing ideas I would view their potential effect on the citizens of the U.S. Juries engage this process when weighing the merits of a courtroom case. While this could be time consuming, the thoroughness of this process explores every aspect of the case. Every compromise must be examined as if this were a matter of life or death.
Today’s politician views the effects of their actions through the eyes of special interest groups. A fantastic example happened recently in California.
“This new law covers private funding; governor signals he may also favor expanding public Cal Grants eligibility” (to illegals).
This means that Captain Moonbeam, Jerry Brown, is setting up a competitive atmosphere between U.S. citizens and illegals for educational funds. Not surprisingly, even illegals have their own special interest group. “For Brown, signing Cedillo’s bill was a gesture of goodwill toward Latino voters, who helped elect him in large numbers last fall.”
.
The Results
Compromise is a gray area. Nobody is ecstatic and nobody is suicidal. Life goes on. Everyday citizens must be the beneficiaries of any legislation.
Let me give you some examples where no compromise was employed.
Abortion is an issue that figuratively went from 0 to 160 mph in a blink of time. Only the Supreme Court postured for the abortion issue. The general public was caught flatfooted. This is an example of a no compromise situation. Abortion should have been a states rights issue and debated at length. Instead since 1973, we have over 50 million less tax payers and many millions of depressed post-abortion individuals.
Obamacare was rushed through the majority Democrat congress without significant debate or compromise. Every Republican compromise to make the bill better was ignored and dismissed. No compromise!!
The Democrats comically do not want to compromise on Obamacare, abortion or any of their bills, however they want significant compromises to Republican bills like deficit reduction or a balance budget amendment
The art of compromise begins with base positioning. It continues with informed bargaining, unemotionally and rationally. Finally, the compromise is a give and take for both sides.
As president I would lead with the following characteristics. Researching, understanding with common sense and educating the public. Only then after listening for the needs of our citizens would I be in a position to exercise my ‘art of compromise’.
Permalink
07.13.11
Posted in If I were President...., Politics at 1:58 am by Administrator
Obama is threatening to hold up social security checks if he does not get his way with the debt limit issue. This sounds like he is taking a page out of the Wisconsin Democrat playbook. He is telling the fiscally responsible Republicans he will not play and that he is taking his ball home. This stance is very immature and very childish for the supposed leader of the free world.
As president, I would never make such a claim. In fact, if there were any questions along those lines with social security, I would throw the full weight of the Presidency behind guaranteeing that those checks will go out on time.
Obama is out of control. Or better stated Obama has lost control. He is claiming to be a victim of the mean Republicans. Be definition all victims’ loose control of their circumstances. That is why they are victims.
Obama is playing the blame game and that cements his victim status. He is nothing more than a victim of the Republicans. They will not raise taxes on Americans. Take notice that the Republicans are still in town, not like the Wisconsin Democrats.
As President I would never claim victim status. I would maintain control over the economy, especially the spending part. During these debt limit talks, I would simply recommend a 10% reduction in spending to all government functions. When the agencies grumble, I would tell them that there is more then 10% waste presently in their agencies so go out and fine it.
I would never play the blame game aimed at scaring old folks with loss of social security. Scaring senior citizens is just another form of hate speech. Obama and the Democrats HATE the Republicans so much that they will lie to the n’th degree to get their way. To me that sounds like they have lost control not only of the economy but of their civility.
Now THIS is CHANGE!!!
Permalink
06.20.11
Posted in If I were President...., Politics at 11:19 pm by Administrator
If I were elected President of the United States, my first priority would be the economic security for all American citizens. Part of my economic security plan revolves around private sector, job creation.
I believe economic security is earned, not given. For all to have economic security all people must be willing to work. My plan will create employment environments through out the United States.
I propose creating experimental ‘Tax Free Zones’ (TFZ) for increasing employment. If these TFZ prove successful, they could be placed in as many locations as needed.
Within these ‘zones’ there would be no federal income tax for employers and employees. Employers would be encouraged to build facilities that employ a minimum of 1500 U.S. citizens. The land for these facilities would be leased from the federal or state government for $1 per year for up to 100 years. The size of the land would vary depending on accessibility and proximity to resources.
States wishing to participate would file an application with my TFZ office. Applications would be due within six (6) weeks of my announcement to be considered for the initial experiment. States would be put on a priority list based on specific criteria as stated in the application process. Twelve (12) states would be initially chosen. Any state chosen that immediately faces any legal challenges would be replaced by the next state on the priority list.
The states will have to agree to a freeze of all home and land values to the 2010 level for surrounding 100 miles. Also they would have to freeze all state taxes to 2010 level.
Employers would go through a four (4) week application process. The criteria would be spelled out on the application. They must be willing to build their own facility without taxpayer dollars. Depending on the size of the TFZ, more than one employer may be considered.
The major qualifications for these TFZ employers would include no unions, comparable wages to the surrounding area, provide employees with medical and dental coverage, offer a 401K plan with 3% matching funds by employer.
This idea is not borrowed from the Chinese. They have experimented with ‘employment zones’ that incorporate self-contained towns. That means there are stores and housing within the Chinese ‘zones’. I feel that the area surrounding my TFZ should be open to capitalist non-speculative private business endeavors. The Chinese do not operate this way.
The Chinese have proposed placing ‘employment zones’ on U.S. soil. I am not in favor of this colonizing scheme. Note the following articles:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-chinese-government-is-buying-up-economic-assets-and-huge-tracts-of-land-all-over-the-united-states.html
http://www.examiner.com/finance-examiner-in-national/china-seeks-to-build-a-city-and-economic-zone-the-state-of-idaho
http://farmwars.info/?p=6247
http://www.american.edu/sis/faculty/upload/Brautigam_Tang_JMAS-2011.pdf
The Chinese are taking a page out of Great Britain’s colonizing history. To allow any foreign nation access to U.S. soil for any reason would be an assault on American freedoms. Has anybody read the story about a Trojan horse? Needless to say I would be against any foreign country trying to establish an international law environment on U.S. soil.
Economic security for all American citizens is achievable. American citizens have always been willing to work. My plan, the ‘Tax Free Zones’ idea, will create an environment for employment through out the United States and the start of economic security for all.
Permalink
06.15.11
Posted in If I were President...., Politics, Vote Out The Bums at 11:24 pm by Administrator
If I was running for president of the United States, the following posts would be a chance for you to get to know me and my philosophical positions. I believe electing a candidate to represent you is about trust. The more you know about me the more you can trust me at my word.
While campaigning for the office of the President of the United States, I will not make any campaign promises that can not be kept. I believe promises (campaign or otherwise) are at the core of a person’s character. Most candidates for public office lie throughout the election process. We have had too many liars in public office especially at the highest levels, the president and congress.
The president should be a leader. Presidents should be a model for future leaders. Can you imagine a president saying “I didn’t inhale”, or “Read my lips, no more taxes” or “I promise an open and transparent government” and trust him at his word?
In the past voters have rationalized voting for someone based on their ethnicity, the way they talk or the way they look. Other historical considerations were what candidates promise to give voters like money (unions), power (party contributors), favors (illegals) or antiquated party alliance.
Past presidents have had their own self-interest at heart. Consequently, they had no consistent, discernible decision-making moral code or philosophy. Their loyalties were to ideologies of others, mainly large contributors. Present and past presidents will lean towards any philosophy that promises reelection. These candidates, when elected, have been manipulated by powerful people with money and specific ideologies to the determent of the average American citizen.
I want to change that prospective. I want to govern from the prospective of an average American citizen. When a specific issue or situation arises, I will ask, ‘what direction would benefit the average American in the streets’. I would forsake the ‘common good’ philosophy for the ‘good for the common individual’ viewpoint.
Most past presidents have not been leaders but followers of grand schemes to accomplish specific one-size-fits-all goal. Most recent presidents seem hell-bent on turning the U.S. into a collective type, socialistic country. History has shown presidents from the early 1900s have set the foundation for today’s stretch run to complete socialism.
Future posts will be topic-specific, philosophy positions of what I will advocate as President of the United States. Get to know me through these posts. Apply the same criteria to all the candidates. VOTB – Vote Out The Bums and let an average Citizen’s prospective take a shot at running the country.
VOTB – vote for a better future for you and your family. Remember electing someone to represent you in government is about trust.
Permalink
06.05.11
Posted in Politics, Vote Out The Bums at 6:58 pm by Administrator
These headlines scream rage.
UPDATE: MIAMI ‘WAR ZONE’ DURING URBAN WEEKEND…
‘I was scared for my life’…
Poet ‘Da Real One’ Gunned Down In Front Of Miami Poetry Cafe…
Violent crime explodes in Myrtle during Black Bike Week; 8-hour hell…
Rib Fest At Rochester beach turns rowdy…
Riot On Long Island…
Urban Melee In Charlotte…
Chaos causes DNC concern for convention…
Unruly urban crowd shuts down Nashville water park…
Drudge Headlines 5.31.11
Fights broke out among rival gang members on Carson Beach in South Boston yesterday and spilled out across the city, triggering a massive law enforcement response from at least five agencies to stem the violence.
Current street rumblings are just the beginning of a Summer of Rage. One has just to read between lines of recent headlines. Add in long-term unemployment with home foreclosures and a rage formula takes shape. Mix in inflammatory and polarizing talk from all sorts of political and media outlets and the rage formula bubbles over into the streets.
Conspiracy theorists will say that Obama’s goal is to create an environment of rage to provoke riots. Then the government can declare Marshall Law and the supreme socialist, BH Obama, will be at the top dictating orders. We may be a few more summers away from major rioting across the U.S. But if BH gets reelected, Vegas will have odds on when and where there will be riots during Odumbo’s second term.
U.S. rage is being previewed in the Middle East. There the basic rage formula (unemployment, popular ignorance and corrupt political leaders) is materializing into the present civil unrest. The Middle East has a ‘dark ages’ mentality, their existence bordering on the uncivilized. The Middle East has relatively no home ownership, no easy credit and no media, no entertainment outlets except beheadings. Their Summer of Rage has already begun.
The U.S. is becoming more uncivilized in the Middle East model. Should Obama continue in his ideologue way, U.S. rage will fundamentally change American culture to the disliking of Constitutionalists that once made the U.S. the land of opportunity.
Can anyone blame U.S. citizens from becoming full of rage? When corrupt politicians want to cut social programs but continue to extend foreign aid and tax breaks to the billionaires (tax-exempt foundations) and multi-national corporations (like GE paying no income tax in 2010), they feel that there is no justice only stupidity in Congress.
Congress Mulls Cuts to Food Stamps Program amid Record Number of Recipients
Dismissing concerns over possible links between Libyan rebels and al Qaeda, the Obama administration has notified Congress it is providing $25 million in nonlethal aid to the rebels’ effort to drive Col. Moammar Gadhafi’s regime from power.
How about spending this $25 million and the other foreign aid/uncollected tax billions on Food Stamps?
Summer rage gives the people on main street something to do. There is no work. There is no affordable housing for the unemployed. Fueling summer rage is the simple fact that there is no hope for earning the American Dream for over 90% of American citizens. (No hope for illegals) Since the U.S. already exemplifies confusion and stupidity in the White House and Congress, chaos will spill over into the streets in the form of rage. Rage is the answer.
VOTB: Vote Out The Bums. Any elected official with a “D” is a socialists follower as indicated by their voting records. The U.S. needs less socialism and more individualism!
Epilogue:
Ahmadinejad: ‘A Mideast Without Israel and America Now Possible’
Ahmadinejad then said: “Behind this attractive appearance lurks the same old criminals, professional and typical thieves, those same slave owners and colonialists and this time their aim is to once again save their own banking system and imperialist interests.
What does Ahmadinejad know that the American people don’t? Maybe he watch and listened to the video “Inside Job”.
Permalink
04.26.11
Posted in Politics, Vote Out The Bums at 7:32 am by Administrator
Obama is a confused man. He’s torn between two faiths, brought up with a ghetto mentality and preached full of racism. Confused men are putty in the hands of their managers. Their goal is to defeat the U.S. the only way possible. They are attacking the dollar and using a confused Obama to that end.
By the world’s standards, everyone in the U.S. is rich! ‘The Rich’ is defined by politicians as taxing every, hard working Americans. Here’s your proof. Obama wants to eliminate the Bush tax cuts. The group hardest hit will be the people making the least amount of money. Their tax rate will go up 50%. The highest earners’ rate will go up less than 40%.
‘Facebook’ Obama is spending more time fund-raising than leading the country. The U.S. dollar is tanking. The congress is playing the blame game with the budget and deficit. They are lining up to point fingers at each other. And the leader of the free world is off socializing like a prostitute whoring for money.
Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate
Can’t figure out why people in power don’t care about this. This is just another reason people around the world are laughing at the people of the U.S.
‘Drill baby drill’ is a meaningless statement. The current spike in oil prices is not an aberration. It is not because of events in Libya, or Syria or Bahrain or Egypt. It results from the built-in pricing problems of the market itself.
Oklahoma will win the NBA championship. The league will do everything possible to stop the Heat. The league wants to curb any thoughts of independence by players trying to form super teams like James, Bosh and Wade did.
24 Signs of Economic Decline in America
VOTB – vote out the bums is the battle cry for 2012
Happy Easter – He IS Alive!
Permalink
03.29.11
Posted in If I were President...., Politics, Vote Out The Bums at 9:53 pm by Administrator
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result. Stupidity is repeating the same mistakes. What the U.S. is doing in Lybia today is both insane and stupid. Radical Islamic, anti-US regimes are the future of the Middle East, if today’s corrupt politicians have anything to say about it.
Remember when the U.S. was HELPING the civilian Arab insurgents against the Russians in Afghanistan during the 1980’s. This insanity and stupidity rearmed those poor civilians as al-Queda and the Taliban. They returned our helping hand on 911. Now, the U.S. is repeating the same mistake. Only this time control of the Middle East oil supply is at stake.
Oil sales have indirectly funded terrorism through several existing Middle East nations. Now corrupt U.S. politicians want the money to go directly to terrorism organizations. Connect the dots.
Dot 1
A U.S. Treasury Department official said Libyan rebels would not be subject to U.S. sanctions if they avoid entities linked to Gaddafi’s regime, which would allow them to sell oil under their control.
Dot 2
Intelligence on the rebel forces battling Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has shown “flickers” of al Qaeda or Hezbollah presence but there is still no detailed picture of the emerging opposition, NATO’s top operations commander said on Tuesday.
Corrupt politicians are more interested in fundraising for their campaigns than remembering how al Qaeda was formed. Late in 1979 the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan. Thirty plus Islamic nations condemned the soviet intervention. The United Nations passed a resolution protesting the Soviet invasion. The U.S. subsequently provided Afghanistan Arab civilians assistance – Charlie Wilson’s War!
Charlie Wilson’s War to “save the Afghanistan civilians cost the US government at least $6 billion (some estimates range as high as $20 billion) worth of arms, training and funds to prop up Arab factions including Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda. Al Qaida leaders, including Osama bin Laden, have repeatedly confirmed that they planned and carried out the September 11 attacks.
U.S. May Supply Gaddafi Rebels With Weapons
Who are the insane politicians that want to repeat the Afghanistan mistake? They are stupid for wanting to repeat the same type of Afghanistan failures.
The Taliban movement/al Qaeda developed and was formed from orphans or refugee children of the Soviet-Afghanistan war. What anti-US regime will be boosted or created from the latest U.S./NATO Middle East intervention. More importantly, how strong will they become with Middle East oil resources?
The Unites States should let the Muslims sort out their own problems. If they are ever ready for a civilized society, democracy will prevail. If an anti-US, militant Islamic regime prevails then one clear national enemy will emerge, like those of World War II. Then the free world can bomb them back to the dark ages.
We will all breath easier when the corrupt politicians in Washington finally open up drilling in the U.S. Brazil has figured that out. Petrobras, which is majority owned by the Brazilian government, purposely services local oil needs first.
How much insanity and stupidity is it going to take for the U.S. citizens to wake up and vote out all the corrupt politicians?
VOTB: Vote Out The Bums – every incumbent, every election.
Return sanity to and remove stupidity from the U.S. political scene.
Permalink
02.21.11
Posted in Politics at 2:22 am by Administrator
Unions and two year olds have several things in common. When they don’t get their way they throw a temper tantrum or demonstrate. Neither has a solution to the problem except trying to get their own way. Both require discipline for their own good.
Two year olds adjust rather quickly to discipline. Within minutes they have evaluated the situation and move on from their tantrum. Unions are slow to make adjustments because of their single-mined rationales. The only common good they care about is inwardly focused.
Unions depart from two year olds in that they deliberately try to produce FEAR – False Evidence Appearing Real. When throwing temper tantrums, unions try to present the illusion that management is taking advantage of them. In reality, management is giving workers an opportunity to earn money. If workers don’t like the working conditions or the pay, they should get a different job. Trying to induce FEAR in management is disingenuous. It’s a lie fueled by selfishness.
In the old days, intimidation through brute force was openly used as a bargaining tool. Today intimidation is publicly sought using the media to sway public opinion. Privately, intimidation is carried out through personal attacks and invading people’s private lives. Unions promote angry (child-like) assaults on any and all opponents.
Union temper tantrums are backed by insecure members and dictator-like leaders (with few exceptions). No body is forcing a person to work in a job that requires belonging to a union. So, insecurity must come along with the job. Union leaders rely on mandatory membership to even have a membership. Only dictators require that everyone belong.
Unions and the politicians they back are the downfall of a nation as exemplified by several European countries. Union members bossed around by the self-centered leaders drain the life out of taxpayers. Taxpayers vote in politicians to take on the duties of running a state or a nation. When those duties involve disciplining ‘out of control’ union contracts, unions revert back to their old selfish selves – demonstrating like two year olds!
Carry this philosophy into two current union situations. The Wisconsin balancing budget scene and the NFL contract situation have obvious solutions.
The Wisconsin public workers and teachers should be happy to have jobs. They are living in the past expecting to have their health care and pensions funded. Today everyone contributes to their own health care and pensions. Union workers should contribute equal to those in private sector jobs. Many in the private sector contribute 100% to both health care and pensions. The duly elected officials in Wisconsin should give ‘sickout’ workers a ‘back to work’ date or they are fired and replaced. Within a week every job would be filled. Fired workers would find out just how unproductive unions really are.
Professional football is entertainment for the masses. Football players do not have to play football to earn a living. Being an entertainer is an option football players choose. The NFL owners should hold out on the players. They should hire replacement players if they want to compete next season. There are plenty of coaches and players willing to play under terms similar to the current contract. The owners are the ones taking the financial risks. The players risk nothing to entertain. They might get hurt, but that is their choice to entertain besides they have disability insurance. Within two seasons the fans will be flocking to stadiums to be entertained because ticket prices will be at a level common folk can afford again.
Unions need to retool for the 21st century. They are living in the 1920’s instead of planning for the 2020’s. Self-interest unions need to epitomize a common societal good or go extinct.
Permalink
02.09.11
Posted in Politics, Religion at 12:54 am by Administrator
The Arab revolution is an interesting development of the Middle East. Revolts in Tunisia, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, Yemen, Sudan and Algeria prove there will be a new global power in the near future to contend with. The countries in revolution make up the southeastern corner of the Mediterranean Sea region. Pieced together they conjure up memories of Saladin and the Ayyubid dynasty.
During the First Crusade, the siege of Jerusalem, Jews fought with Muslims to defend Jerusalem against the Crusaders. Truth be told, Crusaders indiscriminately massacred Jews and Muslims alike. Estimates of 20,000 to 30,000 Jews were slaughtered by Crusaders.
Subsequent Crusades ended favorably for the Muslims. Saladin, the Sultan of Egypt, recaptured Jerusalem during the third Crusade. Saladin, adhering to the teachings of Islam, did not slaughter the city’s Christian and Jewish inhabitants. Instead, Saladin’s noble act won him the respect of his opponents and many people throughout the world.
Upon the capture of Jerusalem, Saladin summoned the Jews and permitted them to resettle in the city. In particular, the residents of Ashkelon, a large Jewish settlement, responded to his request.
Saladin presided over the Ayyubid dynasty after taking Jerusalem.Egypt was the center of Saladin’s dynasty. After the crusades, Saladin became admired by both Christians and Muslims for his chivalry and noble character. When the pieces of the current Arab revolution complete the puzzle and the picture is clear. The only question is will their leaders emulate Saladin?
Let us examine the primary players of the Arab revolution.
Al-Jazeera, the Qatar-based television station, continues to play the bad boy in the Middle East. Hailing the principles of free expression, so rare in the Arab world, it appointed itself to trigger nothing less than a revolution in this region.
The Muslim Brotherhood was formed in Egypt in 1928, initially part of the resistance to British control. Reports from on the ground in Egypt, Jordan and Tunisia link the three inflamed countries to the Muslim Brotherhood.
The Society of Muslim Brotherhood is a fundamentalist international organization whose goals are the conversion of Muslim countries into states ruled by Sha’aria law, the re-establishment of the Caliphate and ultimately, world dominion. The Muslim Brotherhood’s ideology, which insists that Islam is a prescription for governance as well as religion, is the prototypical example of Islamism. Their slogan is self-explanatory: “God is our purpose, the Prophet our leader, the Qur’an our constitution, Jihad our way and dying for God’s cause our supreme objective.
The ominous people that groomed B.H. Obama for the presidency and eventually got him elected welcome the Arab revolution in the Middle East. Obama’s mission is clear – be a sympathizer to Middle East riots and facilitate the takeovers by the likes of the Muslin Brotherhood. He is accomplishing this task with his politically correct attitude and tolerance at all costs for his Muslim brothers.
One comment by Aviad Pohoryles in the daily Maariv was entitled “A Bullet in the Back from Uncle Sam.” This article indirectly confirms the Obama administration’s ‘all talk, no action’ philosophy. The article accused Obama and his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of pursuing a naive, smug, and insular diplomacy heedless of the risks. Quote, “The politically correct diplomacy of American presidents throughout the generations … is painfully naive.”
Two dynamic processes are happening right before our eyes. One is the Arab liberation revolution. The second process is the acceleration of the decline of the West. Right before our eyes the superpowers are turning into palaver powers.
All corrupt U.S. politicians are standing naively aside and are simple-mindedly watching the Arab revolution take place. There is one politician that understands what the Arab revolution means. This congressman from Florida specifically explains in just over a minute the truth about Islam. Click on link below.
http://secure.afa.net/afa/activism/takeaction.asp?id=384
When Saladin left Egypt and marched to Syria, he was dreaming of forming a strong united front to face the crusaders. Are groups like the Muslim Brotherhood dreaming the same dream with their enemy being western civilization? Is the goal of this Arab revolution to revive Saladin’s Ayyubid dynasty?
“European merchants supply the best weaponry, contributing to their own defeat.” Saladin
Epilogue: An Afghan physiotherapist will be executed within three days for converting to Christianity. If this is Afghanistan’s idea of democracy, what the hell are our troops dying for?
Permalink
01.31.11
Posted in Politics, Vote Out The Bums at 10:40 pm by Administrator
Corrupt politicians and blockhead, uninformed voters are playing a loser’s game – the Great American Giveaway. This game has been played by politicians for the past 50 years. Obama’s 2011 state of the union address confirms the game as he circumvented how corrupt politicians have failed to protect America – the land of opportunity.
Obama tried to conjure up a plausible vision of an America left behind after globalization changed the rules ‘overnight’. He bemoaned the loss of a blue collar lifestyle bankrolled by a decent paycheck and benefits. Sorry B.H. but globalization didn’t change the rules and it definitely didn’t happen overnight. Corrupt U.S. politicians systematically exterminated American employment opportunities and allowed societal changes while playing the Great American Giveaway game.
The bipartisan Great American Giveaway is as simple as A, B, C, to understand and reverse. Below are several key political decisions over the past 50 years that have expedited the Great American Giveaway.
A. Henry Kissinger declared in the 1970’s, ‘If you control the oil you control the country……’ Kissinger knew what he and Nixon were doing. They gave Middle East oil producing countries control over U.S. energy supply. Future politicians compounded the ‘giveaway’ by not developing oil reserves in North America. Obama is continuing in their footsteps by closing down oil drilling in the Gulf.
Obama carried on in his speech, “The rules have changed. In a single generation, revolutions in technology have transformed the way we live, work and do business.” Then he noted that rising powers like India and China were now highly competitive. They are competitive because of the Great American Giveaway.
B. When Bill Clinton and Al Gore came to power in January 1993, the United States was at the apex of its power. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) was then a minor player on the world’s stage, both militarily and diplomatically. For the first time in American history, a U.S. administration (Bill Clinton and Al Gore) made diluting American power and strengthening her potential adversaries the centerpiece of its national-security policy.
Bill and Al opened the floodgates for our technology to flow into Asia. Now these two bozos are relaxing in their cushy retirement lifestyles, while the rest of us are in a recession.
C. For the past 50 years, immigrants, mostly illegal, and social progressives are not assimilating established American traditions. These groups are using corrupt politicians and the legal system to radically modify traditional beliefs and values. To compound matters, they are ignoring the Constitution that made America truly a land of opportunity.
Obama’s commented that “We need to out-innovate, out-educate and out-build the rest of the world.” Obviously, Obama does not know that immediately after World War II, the United States of America was the most innovative, educated and built up country in the world.
Obama speaks like a historical ignominious. If he really wanted to out-do the rest of the world, he would do three things. He would put a tariff on all goods coming from Asia to the U.S. He would drill for oil in North America. And he would put constitutionalists in judgeship positions at all levels of the judicial system.
He does not want a strong America, because he will not do any of those things. That’s why he and the rest of the corrupt politicians in Congress need to be voted out of office – every incumbent, every election.
VOTB – Vote Out The (America giveaway) Bums. Don’t give any politicians a chance to play the Great American Giveaway game again. Vote out every incumbent, every election. Make sure there are no more Great American Giveaways.
“Without debate, without criticism… no republic can survive” John Fitzgerald Kennedy
Visit the VOTB store and vote!!
Permalink
« Previous Page — « Previous entries « Previous Page · Next Page » Next entries » — Next Page »
